![]() Note to self: If you have a case where everything works properly, DO NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, delete it, but rather place it in an archive for safe keeping.īut, whereas the older case gave proper results for flow past a body, when I made the substitutions, I got very strange results for the U flowfield, as seen in the attached image. Now it was okay, and I didn't have to include all of those caseDicts in the BC files. I solved my #include files problem by taking the mesh, along with the flow parameters, and plugging them into an older case that actually worked properly. Thanks again I am fortunate to receive help from knowledgeable people such as yourself. You might have to use the refresh button in paraview or restart it once the results are there. If you do have a writeInterval set so that an actual time step folder is written each time they should be read when opening paraview. ![]() If that isn't already the case for includeEtc.but they can't cover every custom variable definition possible. You could ofcourse say that is lazy work of the plugin creators and the devs might add those to the next paraview version. Because it does normally not include any result files, but might have those custom definitions. This is why the default is to skip the zero time step folder. If you define abbreviations and custom variables like includeEtc this fails. foam ending to your case folder and paraview will know to check a constant folder for a polyMesh and how to read that, as paraview is shipped with a reader plugin for. Hence you could just install paraview on any system, add an empty file with a. So when you enter paraFoam that is a very short script that simply creates an empty dummy file case.foam and tells paraview to open that file. The openfoam devs are simply providing a plugin. You need to change those, because ParaView is made by another software company. However! I am tracking the forces in this case, and in postProcessing, I see this output: P and U are now showing, but when I pick the 'run' triangle at the top, they do not increment, but just stay at the initial condition. So after all these changes to satisfy the paraView gripes, here is what happens: In this particular case, why are these changes necessary? Who knows? They seem to be a clumsy measure for a problem that shouldn't be there. }I also found that openFoam was not recognizing 'include/initialConditions', so I had to change all the BC's to remove that reference, and put in all the actual values. ![]() #includeEtc "caseDicts/setConstraintTypes" - Set patchGroups for constraint patches are not appearing in paraView when I run my case - CFD Online Discussion Forums ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |